Situation Report EEPA HORN No. 30 – 19 December

Europe External Programme with Africa is a Belgium-based Centre of Expertise with in-depth knowledge, publications, and networks, specialised in issues of peace building, refugee protection and resilience in the Horn of Africa. EEPA has published extensively on issues related to movement and/or human trafficking of refugees in the Horn of Africa and on the Central Mediterranean Route. It cooperates with a wide network of Universities, research organisations, civil society and experts from Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Uganda and across Africa. Key in-depth publications can be accessed on the website.

Regional situation (as confirmed per 19 December)

– Al Shabaab, Somalia’s al Qaeda-allied Islamist extremist group, claims responsibility for a suicide attack in Mogadishu, Somalia, at a rally to be attended by PM Mohamed Hussein Roble, killing at least ten people. The commander of the 21st Division of the SNA General Abdiaziz Abdullahi Qooje and the commander of Danab forces in Galmudug Col Mukhtar Abdi Aden.

– Eritrea has in the past trained Al Shabaab and provided military support to it.

– Kenya and Somaliland have agreed to establish direct Kenya Airways flights between Nairobi and Hargeisa in Somaliland. This move comes shortly after an agreement was reached for Kenya to open a consulate in Hargeisa. The closer relations has created concern in Mogadishu and led to the severance of diplomatic relations between Kenya and Somalia.

– Sudanese military would be advancing towards the disputed Ethiopia-Sudan border area. The Sudanese Commander-in-Chief, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, also visited the area on Thursday.

– Eritrean soldiers have been digging trenches on the border with Ethiopia according to multiple reports. Sudanese authorities have been warning people to be cautious in the border area.

– The Sudanese government has accused the Ethiopian government of using artillery against Sudanese troops conducting operations in the border area. Tensions have been rising between the two countries in recent weeks after Sudan reoccupied land that it said was occupied by Ethiopian farmers. The government of Ethiopia has so far not commented on the matter.

– Special forces of Afar and Amahara have reportedly, for the last three days, been fighting each in Tigray

– A fire was detected during the night of Dec. 15-16 within Hagere Selam town in South Eastern Tigray. This appears to corroborate reports of ongoing attacks in the area.

International dimension (as confirmed per 19 December)

– Both the UK government and the EU received questions by parliamentarians about their respective roles in Ethiopia. In its response the British government said that Eritrea categorically denied the presence of troops in Tigray. They also denied forcing Eritrean refugees back to Eritrea.

– Egypt has condemned the border attack by Ethiopia on Sudan. The government has said that it stands in full solidarity with Sudan and calls for all measures to ensure that such events do not reoccur. Both Sudan and Egypt are in the middle of a struggle with Ethiopia, which is building a major new dam on the Blue Nile. Egypt and Sudan fear this could have severe impact downriver. The three countries have been in negotiations, however a compromise has not been reached yet.

– The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) demands that journalist Dawit Kebebe be released immediately. He has been held since november 30th for disseminating false information and tarnishing the image of the government but has not been charged. CPJ also calls for other journalists to be released.

– The Anglican Communion has expressed regret at the death toll in Tigray. The Secretary General has written in a letter that he is deeply concerned about the current situation in Tigray.

Human Rights (as confirmed per 19 December)

– Reportedly 37 civilians were killed by Eritrean troops in Mariam Dengelat. This follows further reports of Ethiopian ENDF soldiers shooting at unarmed civilians. Recent days has also seen the emergence of names of civilians killed in Tigray emerging, this includes an entire family in Adigrat

– On social media claims of four named priests and three civilians killed by troops (reportedly ENDF and Eritrean allied troops) in Zalambessa.

Situation refugees (as confirmed per 19 December)

– Reports of Sudan authorities are instructing recently arrived Ethiopian/Tigrians refugees in Hamadyat camp to dismantle and go to the mainland of Sudan in fear of potential war between Ethiopia. This instruction was given to the refugees Friday.

– Satellite pictures have detected fires in Shimelba refugee camp in TIgray. The origin is unknown.

Reported situation in Tigray (as confirmed per 19 December)

– Ethiopia is offering rewards of 10 million Ethiopian birr (roughly $250,000 / 205,000 euros) for information on the exact location of members of the TPLF leadership that leads to their capture. A hotline for information has been set up

– Looting continues to be reported, including 500 dairy cows and hundreds of calves stolen by Amharic forces.

– Communication with the region remains difficult. Many people are still unable to contact family and friends. News and events remain hard to confirm.

– Mekelle University announces graduation ceremony of students, pictures online are from previous years.

– Staff at Mekelle University are reporting back to work.

Reported situation in Ethiopia (as confirmed per 19 December)

– Oromo protests aimed to inform the international community about the negative electoral environment for the upcoming election as much of the Oromo leaders are in prison.

– There is concern about the inability to contact an Ethiopian church bishop in Adigrat. No communication has been received since 23 November when he reported shortages of food and medicine.

– Huawei is looking to move its regional headquarters, currently in DRC, to Ethiopia. It has said that it aims to take advantage of the growth of the telecommunications sector.

 

Disclaimer:

All information in this situation report is presented as a fluid update report, as to the best knowledge and understanding of the authors at the moment of publication. EEPA does not claim that the information is correct but verifies to the best of ability within the circumstances. Publication is weighed on the basis of interest to understand potential impacts of events (or perceptions of these) on the situation. Check all information against updates and other media. EEPA does not take responsibility for the use of the information or impact thereof. All information reported originates from third parties and the content of all reported and linked information remains the sole responsibility of these third parties. Report to info@eepa.be any additional information and corrections.

Links of interest

https://graphics.reuters.com/ETHIOPIA-CONFLICT/xklpyjmndvg/
https://www.rfi.fr/fr/afrique/20201218-soudan-nouvelle-mont%C3%A9e-de-tension-dans-le-triangle-d-el-fashaga-%C3%A0-la-fronti%C3%A8re-%C3%A9thiopienne
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20201218-ethiopia-offers-reward-for-help-finding-dissident-tigray-leaders
https://www.france24.com/en/africa/20201218-somalia-suicide-bombing-misses-pm-but-kills-several-top-commanders

 

Situation Report EEPA HORN No. 29 – 18 December

Europe External Programme with Africa is a Belgium-based Centre of Expertise with in-depth knowledge, publications, and networks, specialised in issues of peace building, refugee protection and resilience in the Horn of Africa. EEPA has published extensively on issues related to movement and/or human trafficking of refugees in the Horn of Africa and on the Central Mediterranean Route. It cooperates with a wide network of Universities, research organisations, civil society and experts from Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Uganda and across Africa. Key in-depth publications can be accessed on the website.

Evolving situation (as confirmed per 18 December)

The Government of Sudan has accused Ethiopia of ambushing Sudanese troops on Wednesday. 4 soldiers died. Large military reinforcements deployed by Sudanese army along the border with Ethiopia after clashes in which Sudanese military were killed and wounded, reports Al Sharq newspaper.

Nine priests killed in the Church in Adi Aweshi, Tembien, Tigray, by Ethiopian and Eritrean troops.

Historic Al Nejashi Mosque (the first mosque in Africa ) was first bombed and later looted by Ethiopian and Eritrean troops. Tigrayan sources are saying that people have died trying to protect the mosque.

Reported that people have been killed in Oromo and Amhara region. The killings were carried out by seperatist groups. It fuels fears that the conflict will spread to wider Ethiopia as ethnic tensions rise.

Eritrean troops looted St. Mary, a Catholic church in Wukro, Tigray, and stole cars from the compound.

The TPLF reportedly used tanks after the beginning of military actions on November 4th. ENDF forces were besieged in some camps for 10 days, after which they surrendered.

Two doctors report heavy shelling at the start of the offensive. The shelling came from Eritrea, the border of which was 200 meters away. Following the shelling one doctor says that he counted 15 dead and 75 wounded. The second doctor says that they received 200 casualties of which 50 were dead on arrival. They mention a pattern of shelling, then arrival of government soldiers, followed by Amhara militias and special forces.

The doctors also reported that they had to evacuate the wounded on trucks as it became too dangerous to stay. Subsequently they had to hide for two days as shooting and killings were taking place nearby. They eventually fled to Sudan.

People have walked to Sudan covering distances of 300 km, reports BBC, and they saw many dead civilians on the way. A doctor states: “I have patients who say they saw Eritrean forces in Tigray who committed atrocities, burning houses and destroying farmland.”

Calls for investigation in the war crimes committed by all parties involved in the ground and air offensive which started on November 4th.

Increasing concern of ‘troll farm’ attacks to silence reporting on the situation.

International dimension (as confirmed per 18 December)

An official in Juba, South Sudan, states that the TPLF elected president, Debretsion Gebremichael, is seeking refuge there. It is understood that he has been in Juba for several weeks. When he arrived he asked the President of South Sudan to mediate. The official also said that Debretsion did not meet with President el-Sisi of Egypt while in South Sudan and did not ask to meet him.

Egypt has expressed full solidarity with Sudan after clashes on the Sudan – Ethiopian border, stating that “Khartoum has the right to defend its security and exercise sovereignty over its territories.”

Chairperson of the Horn of Africa Civil Society Forum, Albaqir Mukhtar, appeals to Sudan Prime Minister Hamdok, chair of the IGAD, “to use all efforts and all diplomatic avenues to bring all parties of this conflict to the negotiating table as has been done in South Sudan and Somalia.”

Ahead of the 20th December IGAD meeting the Horn of Africa Civil Society Forum urges Ethiopia PM Abiy Ahmed to accept IGAD as mediator in the regionalising conflict.

Julia Cassell, the former Minister of Gender from Liberia, urges African leaders to create the conditions for peace on the ground. Cassell is joined by nearly 120 women from 20 countries across the African continent: Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan, South Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Benin, Niger, Ghana, Nigeria, DR Congo, Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, Cameroon, Tanzania, Zimbabwe and South Africa.

In the US, Black Lives Matter stands in solidarity with “all disenfranchised and displaced people in the Horn of Africa who are affected by violent conflict in Ethiopia.”

Situation refugees (as confirmed per 18 December)

More than half of the over 65,000 refugees that arrived in Sudan are children and many have been separated from family members.

The ICRC has released statistics on medical and first aid assistance provided in Tigray. These include over 2000 wounded, of which 550 were critical.

UNHCR and partners working in four Tigray refugee camps with nearly 100,000 refugees continue to experience “challenges to access the camps and sustain the operational capacity on the ground.”

Refugees in the four camps in Tigray urge aid to be provided to the other two camps Shimelba and Hitsats and they warn that camps are not yet safe.

Reported situation in Tigray (as confirmed per 18 December)

UN mission in Afar finds that “thousands of newly internally displaced people need water, sanitation and hygiene services, as well as medical supplies and care”.

There continue to be reports of Eritrean soldiers looting in Tigray. Computers and other equipment was allegedly taken from a school operated by a Catholic mission.

The United Nations has announced USD 36 million in emergency aid for civilians in Tigray. The majority will go to the purchase of medicine and food and civilian protection.

Mekelle University announces a graduation ceremony. The online announcement is not matching the reality on the ground as many students have left and students and professors are still out of reach.

Reported situation in Ethiopia (as confirmed per 18 December)

Desert locusts threaten food security in Ethiopia and the wider region.

 

Disclaimer:

All information in this situation report is presented as a fluid update report, as to the best knowledge and understanding of the authors at the moment of publication. EEPA does not claim that the information is correct but verifies to the best of ability within the circumstances. Publication is weighed on the basis of interest to understand potential impacts of events (or perceptions of these) on the situation. Check all information against updates and other media. EEPA does not take responsibility for the use of the information or impact thereof. All information reported originates from third parties and the content of all reported and linked information remains the sole responsibility of these third parties. Report to info@eepa.be any additional information and corrections.

Links of interest

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-conflict-attack-idUSKBN28R1IE 
https://addisstandard.com/news-as-killings-of-civilians-continue-in-metekel-authorities-in-benishagul-gumuz-amhara-regional-states-step-up-blames 
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-55236354
https://www.unocha.org/story/daily-noon-briefing-highlights-ethiopia-4
https://www.sudanspost.com/ethiopias-debretsion-seeking-refuge-in-juba-official-confirms
http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/1/64/397091/Egypt/Politics-/Egypt-expresses-its-condolences-to-Sudan-over-vict.aspx
https://www.abnewswire.com/pressreleases/african-women-appeal-for-a-horn-of-africa-peace-initiative_523311.html

Situation Report EEPA HORN No. 28 – 17 December

Europe External Programme with Africa is a Belgium-based Centre of Expertise with in-depth knowledge, publications, and networks, specialised in issues of peace building, refugee protection and resilience in the Horn of Africa. EEPA has published extensively on issues related to movement and/or human trafficking of refugees in the Horn of Africa and on the Central Mediterranean Route. It cooperates with a wide network of Universities, research organisations, civil society and experts from Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Uganda and across Africa. Key in-depth publications can be accessed on the website.

Iternational dimension (as confirmed per 17 December)

– The European Union asks: (1) full humanitarian access, (2) allowing refugees to seek refuge in neighbouring countries, (3) end discrimination and ethnic prosecution, (4) the establishment of a mechanism for independent investigation of human rights violations, (5) and the restablishment of communication and media channels to Tigray.

Regional dimension (as confirmed per 17 December)

– The Somali Prime Minister is set to formally demand the removal of Kenyan troops from AMISOM. Reportedly he wants these replaced with Eritrean troops. Previously Ethiopian Tigray troops were taken off AMISOM. Eritrea has been accused in the past of training and supporting Al Shabaab. Observers warn the impact this re-arrangement may have on counter-terrorism policies.

– Somalia may stop issuing visas to Kenyan troops in AMISOM by the end of the month.

– In clashes at the Sudan-Ethiopia border, four Sudanese soldiers have been killed and twelve more wounded. The clash took place on territory claimed by Ethiopian farmers.

– PM Hamdok of Sudan deplores loss of military who “were ambushed by some Ethiopian forces and militias inside Sudanese territory”.

– Discussion on border issues between both countries was on the agenda of the Summit between Ethiopian PM Abiy and Sudan PM Hamdok last Sunday. Discussions on the border disputes are due to start next week in Khartoum according to the Sudan Tribune.

– Firefights are reported in Mogadishu as anti-government demonstrations are taking place. Local militias and security forces have been clashing.

Human Rights (as confirmed per 17 December)

– A Catholic bishop and several nuns and other missionary members, based in Adigrat, are missing.

– AFP reports that the Federal Ethiopian army separated men and women and executed a group of men
in the village of Bisober in Southern Tigray on November 14th.

– Witnesses tell about executions of civilians in the Wukro area during November 25th -29th.

Situation refugees (as confirmed per 17 December)

– Eritrean refugees who fled from Tigray refugee camps to Addis Ababa and were forced to return to Tigray have been taken to two camps (Mai Aini and Adi Harush), even if they lived in Shimelba and Hitsats camps before.

– There is a severe shortage of food and water in Mai Aini.

– Eritrean refugees are suffering from hunger and lack of medical assistance in Tigray refugee camps. Women are reportedly giving birth without medical assistance.

– Many families have been separated. Calls for an urgent family tracing program to support reunification and information regarding missing persons.

Reported situation in Tigray (as confirmed per 17 December)

– In Tembien, Adi Qeweylo, Tigray, nine priests were killed by Federal Ethiopian and Eritrean troops.

– Reports of looting continue to come in. Eritrean soldiers are said to continue plundering valuable equipment from factories and universities. Videos have come out of what the descriptions claim are Eritrean trucks in Shire Endasilasie carrying loot back to Eritrea.

– Social media reports state that Eritrean soldiers may be engaged in “massive looting” of cultural artifacts. This could include raids on remote monasteries which keep ancient manuscripts. Ancient Christian religious manuscripts and texts may be in danger. Calls on UNESCO to investigate.

– Report that Al-Njesahi Mosque of Negash (Tigray) is looted; the oldest Muslim settlement in Africa.

– The UN has confirmed that 18 trucks have reached Eritrean refugee camps in Tigray.

– The UN states it does not have unhindered and full access to the region.

– More supplies, organised by the ICRC, have arrived in Mekelle.

Reported situation in Ethiopia (as confirmed per 17 December)

– A number of Tigrayans who have spoken with the New Humanitarian have said that they have encountered growing ethnic profiling and discrimination. They are experiencing harassment on the streets, but have also been targeted by government investigations. The government has been acting against TPLF members, but non-members say that they have been targeted as well.

– The Ethiopian deputy PM, Demeke Mekonnen, has met with UN senior officials to discuss the latest developments in Tigray.

CORRECTION: Journalist (as per yesterday’s report) not arrested but journey was delayed.

 

Disclaimer:

All information in this situation report is presented as a fluid update report, as to the best knowledge and understanding of the authors at the moment of publication. EEPA does not claim that the information is correct but verifies to the best of ability within the circumstances. Publication is weighed on the basis of interest to understand potential impacts of events (or perceptions of these) on the situation. Check all information against updates and other media. EEPA does not take responsibility for the use of the information or impact thereof. All information reported originates from third parties and the content of all reported and linked information remains the sole responsibility of these third parties. Report to info@eepa.be any additional information and corrections.

Links

https://sayarainternational.com/rapid-research-on-the-humanitarian-crisis-in-ethiopia/
https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news-feature/2020/12/16/Ethnic-profiling-Tigray-tensions-Ethiopia
https://twitter.com/RAbdiAnalyst/status/1339228121216725008?s=20
http://www.africaglobalvillage.com/first-foreign-aid-arrives-in-tigray-as-civillians-recount-the-horrors/
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20201215-terrified-survivors-recount-attacks-on-civilians-in-tigray
Sudan Tribune

 

ሶስቱ የጥፋት ፈረሶችና የኢትዮጵያ ፍጻሜ!

አሁን ካለንበት የትግራይ ጦርነት ብኋላ፣ መደምደሚያው ምንም ይሁን፣ ኢትዮጵያ እንደ አገር የመቀጠል እድሏ ተመናምኗል። አክትሞላታል ማለት ይቻላል። ህወሓት ጦርነቱን ቢያሽንፍ እንኳን ተመልሶ አገር በማስተዳደር ረገድ ከእንግዲህ ድርሻ ይኖረዋል ብሎ ማሰብ የዋህነት ነው። ህዝቡም ህወሓትም ያንን እድል/ሁኔታ ዳግም የሚፈልጉት አይመስለኝም። ጠላት ከሚሉት ኢሳያስ አፈወርቂ ጋር የራሳቸውን ህዝብ እየደበደቡ ያሉት ባንዳዎቹና ግልገል ተነጣፊዎቻቸው ከቀናቸው ኢትዮጵያን ማስቀጠል የሚችሉበት ቁመና ላይ ሊሆኑ አይችሉም። ዝርዝሩን አቀርባለሁ።
የኦሮሚያ ብልጽግና፣ የአማራ ብልጽግናና የሻዕቢያ አላቻ ጋብቻ በልጅነቴ እየሰማሁት ያደግሁት የዘንዶ ታሪክ ያስታውሰኛል። እነዚህ ሶስቱ ሀይሎች በተናጠል ከህወሓት አንጻር ሲታዩ ቁጫጭ ናቸው። በጋራ ካልሆነ በተናጠል ህወሓትን መሞከር ቀርቶ ማሰብ የማይታሰብ ነው። ጋብቻቸው ስትራቴጂካል ነው፤ በቅድሚያ በጋራ ተረባርበው ይጥሉታል፣ አንደኛው ለስልጣኑ፣ ሁለተኛው ለመሬቱ ሶስተኛው ለበቀል። ሶስቱም ግን ሌላ የሚያመሳስላቸው አንድ ወሳኝ ባህሪ አለ። ሶስቱም ኤክስፓንሺንስት/ተስፋፊ ና ኦፖርቹኒስቲክ ናቸው። በለስ ቀንቷቸው ህወሓትን ካስወገዱ፣ ባስወገዱ በማግስቱ ሌላ የመስፋፋትና እርስ በእርስ የመዋዋጥ ጌም ይጀምራሉ፥
1 የኦሮሚያው ብልጽግና ሁለቱን የሚፈልጋቸው ለሚቀጥሉት አስርት አመታት ስልጣን ላይ ለመቆየት መጠቀሚያ ለማድረግ ነው። ካልጠቀለላቸው ይህን ማሳካት አልችልም ብሎ ነው የሚያስበው። ከእርሱ ፈቃድ ውጪ መግባትና መውጣት የማይችሉ፣ ወዶና ፈቅዶ ብቻ ስልጣን የሚሸነሽናቸው አሻንጉሊቶች መሆን የግድ አለባቸው። አለበለዚያ የቀድሞ ጓዶቻቸውን ጉድጓድ ይጋራሉ። በሀሳብ ደረጃ፣ ሶማሊያን፣ ጅቡቲ፣ ኤርትራን፣ ሱዳንን ጠቅልለን በምስራቅ አፍሪካ ታላቅ “አገር” በገዳ አምሳል እንመሰርታለን የሚል ጽንፍ የረገጠ ተስፋፊ አጀንዳ ይዞ የተነሳ ቡድን መሆኑ አይዘነጋም።
2 የአማራ ብልጽግና የመሬት ይገባኛል ጥያቄ በወልቃይትና በራያ አይመለስም። በሰሜን በኩል አሰብን ይጠይቃል። ዳር ድንበሬ ቀይ ባህር ድረስ ነው ይላል። ከኦሮሚያም ሰፋፊ የሚጠይቃቸው ግዛቶችና ከተሞች አሉት። በድሮዋ የኢትዮጵያ ካርታ የሚታየው የአገሪቱ ክፍል በጠቅላላ የአማራ ግዛት ነው። የአማራ መሬት ነው። ጠንካራ ኢኮኖሚ፣ ጠንካራ ሰራዊት፣ በመገንባት ማእከሉን ይቆጣጠራል። ወይም መቆጣጠር አለብኝ ብሎ ያስባል። ካለበለዚያ ህልውናው ሁሌም አደጋ ላይ እንደወደቀ ይሰማዋል። እየተሽሎከልለከና በሁለት ሶስት ፓርቲዎች እየተደራጀ ጡንቻውን ማፈርጠም ከህዝብ ያልተሰወረ ስልቱ ነው።
3 ኢሳያስ ህወሓት በተወገደ ማግስት ከኋላ ሆኜ እዘውራለሁ፣ ኢትዮጵያን በእጃዙር እገዛለሁ ብሎ ነው የሚያምነው። እየኮረኮመ የሚያሰራውን ከመጋረጃው ጀርባ በቡችላው አብይ አማካኝነት መሾም መቻል ይሆናል ነው ምኞቱ። ካልሆነ ከወዲ ዜናዊ ጋር የተጀመረው ጸብ በሲዝን ሁለት ይቀጥላል።
አስተዋላችሁ? በመካከላቸው እርስ በእርሳቸውም ሆነ፣ ከነሱ ውጪ ካለው ቡድን ጋር በእኩልነት መኖር የሚያስችል አጀንዳና የስነልቦና ቅድመዝግጁነት የላቸውም። ባህሪያቸው አንዱ ሌላኛውን ውጦ መዘንደድ ነው። ህወሓት በክልል ቆራርጦ ኢትዮጵያን ቢያሳንሳትም፣ በህግ አውቶኖሚውን ለክልሎች ሰጥቷል። ተጠቅመውበታል አልተጠቀሙበትም ሌላ ጉዳይ ሆኖ፣ ካልተመቻቸው እስከመገንጠል ድረስ ልዩ መብት የሚያጎናጽፍ ህገመንግስት ሰጥቷቸዋል። ትናንሽ ግን አውቶኖመስ የሆኑ የፖለቲካ ዩኒቶች (ክልሎችና ልዩ ዞኖች) በእኩልነትና በመፈቃቀድ የተመሰረተ አብሮነት ሲኖራቸው ብቻ አገር በጋራ ያስቀጥላሉ፤ ተብሎ ለ30 አመታት (ግማሹ የኢትዮጵያ ህዝብ የተመረተበት አመታት) ተሰርቶበታል። ኖረውበታልም።
ገሚሱ የኢትዮጵያ ህዝብ ከዚህ የአስተዳደር ሲስተም ውጪ ሌላ የሚያውቀው ነገር የለም። እንደ አይንአር በአንዴ ጠርገህ ልታጸዳውና ሊረሳ የሚችል ጉዳይ አይደለም። እናም በማዕከላዊ መንግስት ይሁንታና ፈቃድ የሚሾሙ የሙስጠፌ፣ የተመስገን ምናምን አይነት ታማኝነታቸው ለአንድ ግለሰብ የሆኑ መሪዎችና ለይስሙላ ብቻ የሚሰየሙ ምክር ቤት ይኖራችኋል፣ ቢባሉ ማናቸውም አሜን ብለው አይቀበሉትም። የቀመሷት ነገር አለች የምትጥም፣ የምትጣፍጥ። ማንነቴን፣ ባህሌን፣ ቋንቋዬን፣ እምነቴን፣ የሚሏት ነገር።
አንዱ ሌላኛውን ሰልቅጦ ለመዘንደድ ሲቧጨቁ፣ ሌላው ለማንነቱ ሲንተጋተግ፣ ሰላም፣ መረጋጋት፣ ልማት፣ አገር፣ ብሎ ነገር ፈጽሞ ያከትምለታል።
ድሕረ ህወሓት የምትኖረው ኢትዮጵያ የፈራረሰች ኢትዮጵያ ብቻ ናት። የታሪክ መጻህፍት ላይ ብቻ የምታገኟት። ፍጻሜዋ ያላማረ። በ21ኛው ክፍለዘመን በእርስ በእርስ ጦርነት እስከዘላለሙ ያሸለበች ኢትዮጵያ።
ይህ እንዳይመጣ ነበር፣ በድርድርና በውይይት አብሮ የሚያኗኑር መላ ፈልጉ፤ ካቃታችሁ ያለው የፌደራሊዝም ስርዓት ይቀጥል ወይስ በሌሎች አማራጮች (ጂኦግራፊ መሰረት ያደረገ ፌደራሊዝም፣ ፍጹም አሃዳዊ ወዘተ) እንተካው ብላችሁ ህዝቡን ጠይቃችሁ በሪፈረንደም ለአንዴና ለመጨረሻ ጊዜ እልባት ያግኝ፤ ብለን ስንመክራችሁ የኖርነው። በመፈቃቀድ ላይ የተመሰረተና የብዙሃን ይሁንታ ያገኘ ስርዓት ከመመምስረት ውጪ ሌላ አምራጭ የላችሁም ስንላችሁ የኖርነው በምክንያት ነው። ኢትኒክ ፌደራሊዝም በጉልበት ተጭኖ ሙሉ ተቀባይነትን እንዳላገኘ ሁሉ፣ አሃዳዊ ስርዓት በጉልበት ተጭኖ ሙሉ ተቀባይነትን አያገኝም። ግማሹን የህበረተሰብ ክፍል ያገለለ ስርዓት ደግሞ መቼም ቢሆን አይጸናም። እናም ከወዲሁ እላለሁ …
ነፍስ ይማር!

Situation reports EEPA HORN

Europe External Programme with Africa is a Belgium-based Centre of Expertise with in-depth knowledge, publications, and networks, specialised in issues of peace building, refugee protection and resilience in the Horn of Africa. EEPA has published extensively on issues related to movement and/or human trafficking of refugees in the Horn of Africa and on the Central Mediterranean Route. It cooperates with a wide network of Universities, research organisations, civil society and experts from Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Uganda and across Africa. Key in-depth publications can be accessed on the website or here:

Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 1, 17 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 2, 18 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 3, 19 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 4, 20 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 5, 22 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 6, 24 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 7, 25 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 8, 26 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 9, 27 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 10, 28 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 11, 29 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 12, 30 November 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 13, 01 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 14, 02 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 15, 03 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 16, 04 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 17, 05 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 18, 07 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 19, 08 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 20, 09 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 21, 10 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 22, 11 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 23, 12 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 24, 13 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 25, 14 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 26, 15 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 27, 16 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 28, 17 December 2020
Situation Report EEPA Horn No. 29, 18 December 2020

What Ethiopia’s Brewing Conflict Means for the Country—and the Region

Source: Small Wars | Aly Verjee and Susan Stigant | USIP Publication

A protracted conflict between the federal government and the Tigray region is still not inevitable, but it will require both sides to choose another path.

Violent conflict between the federal government of Ethiopia and the federal state of Tigray, in the country’s north, began November 4 and quickly escalated. USIP’s Aly Verjee and Susan Stigant discuss the crisis and identify what could be done to avoid further violent conflict in east Africa’s most populous country.

Unfortunately, violence is not new to Ethiopia; already, there are over 1.4 million conflict-affected internally displaced persons in the country. What is the broader significance of this latest violence between the federal government and the Tigray region?

Stigant: The rapidity of the escalation of violence between Tigray and Addis Ababa is concerning in itself, given the stakes for Ethiopia’s peace and stability. This conflict has the potential to quickly become more polarized and increase violence throughout Ethiopian society. Already, the Tigray region has called for the full mobilization of all citizens to fight. The federal government, led by Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, has also used uncompromising language to justify his government’s actions. As the allegations and incidents mount—including possible war crimes—and the number of people affected increases, it will become much harder to find a peaceful solution.

At the same time, solely focusing on what is going on today in Tigray risks obscuring broader concerns about violence, democratic backsliding, and repression elsewhere in the country. As a horrific example of the type of violence in Ethiopia that has become all too common, on November 1, ethnically targeted killings left at least 54 people dead in a schoolyard in the Wollega zone of Oromia state. Throughout western Ethiopia, communal violence has only increased since 2018. In southern Ethiopia, tensions remain high, as the consequences of the model of ethnic federalism continue to unfold.

Verjee: As I warned in April 2019, tensions between the regions have the potential to overwhelm the political management capacity of the center. The conflict in Tigray has already pulled in forces from the neighboring Amhara Regional State to fight the Tigrayans. The leadership of the Somali Regional State has also taken the side of the federal government in the dispute. In the broader context, it does not really matter who is responsible for starting the violence; all Ethiopians, no matter their ethnicity, have to find a way to live side-by-side, which will not be accomplished by jailing or killing the political and military elite of Tigray. The ruling party of Tigray, the Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), which once led the ruling party coalition that preceded the Abiy government, are no angels. But for the federal government to risk throwing the whole country into a protracted civil conflict—with significant cross-border consequences—is also highly unfortunate.

Already, a humanitarian crisis is in the making. More than 11,000 refugees have already crossed the border with Sudan, with thousands more almost certain to follow. Drawing in Eritrea and Sudan into the conflict may easily bring in other regional and extra-regional powers, leaving the Horn of Africa in a complicated, messy crisis from which it may take many years to recover, at a cost of thousands of lives. As the USIP Red Sea Senior Study Group recently warned, “Intrastate or interstate conflict would be catastrophic for Ethiopia’s people and for the region and would pose a direct threat to international peace and security.”

The dispute between Tigray and the federal government has been festering for some time. Could violence be avoided?

Stigant: The federal government has characterized its action as a rule of law operation to uphold the constitution, and that it would act with “utmost care for the overall wellbeing, safety and security of our citizens.” The federal government has described the September 2020 elections held by the Tigray region as illegitimate and has objected to equating the federal government to the TPLF. While there are more than two sides to every story, there is little doubt that relations were strained with Tigray. That said, the paramount constitutional right of any citizen is the right to life. Before resorting to military action and the attendant deaths of Ethiopian citizens, every other possibility needed to be exhausted, even if the Tigray authorities were being uncooperative. More pragmatically, the use of force rarely works to sustain a political settlement, as the history of Ethiopia has shown on numerous occasions.

As the cornerstone of his rule, Prime Minister Abiy set out a philosophy of medemer, or coming together, to overcome the divisions of the past. Less than a year ago, in accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Abiy mentioned the word love seven times, and the words forgiveness and reconciliation four times each. Ethiopia does not need Abiy to love Tigray, nor vice versa; but forgiveness and reconciliation cannot occur if belligerent parties do not show restraint.

Verjee: The federal government has already suspended fiscal transfers to Tigray and cut off communications and cross-border trade. Even if the allegation that the TPLF posed an imminent threat by its purported seizure of weapons and a military base is entirely accurate, a proportionate, limited response was the most that could be justified. Although the federal government has said that its operations will be time limited, Abiy has also said that he will not rest until the “the criminal junta is disarmed, legitimate administration in the region restored, and fugitives apprehended and brought to justice,” which are objectives that could take months, if not years, to achieve. Although the warning signs have been there for some time, a protracted violent conflict is still not inevitable, but it will require both sides to choose another path.

Abiy should also consider that his own position as head of the government comes in the context of an ongoing debate about the future of the constitutional order of Ethiopia. Were it not for COVID-19, Ethiopia should have held elections this year, in which Abiy would have had the opportunity to obtain a democratic mandate. Abiy may be prime minister and enjoy the powers of that office but should consider his administration bound by norms that limit the actions of an unelected official.

To date, the federal government has rejected mediation of this crisis. Going forward, what role should national and international actors play to try and de-escalate the situation?

Stigant: For years, Ethiopia has been at the heart of establishing regional and continental mechanisms for addressing violent conflict. These include the Conflict Early Warning and Response Mechanism of the regional intergovernmental organization IGAD, which Ethiopia chaired for years, and the Peace and Security Council and the Panel of the Wise of the African Union (AU). As the AU’s host nation, there is arguably a special responsibility on Ethiopia to call on these indigenous African institutions not as an intrusion on sovereignty, but to model exemplary behavior for all African states.

Domestically, there have been multiple calls for a national dialogue to forge a political agreement regarding the conduct of elections and then on the constitutional order following the elections. As violence escalates in the country, it becomes both more urgent and more challenging to move a dialogue process forward. While the federal government has already announced such an effort, any initiative will need to be revisited in light of the changing circumstances. Ultimately, the credibility of any dialogue will be judged on the extent to which it includes key groups, reaches agreement on preparatory steps and confidence-building measures, and demonstrates that people can have genuine, safe, and frank conversations.

Verjee: The United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom, all leading humanitarian donors, should urgently articulate the acute priority of preserving and enhancing humanitarian access to Tigray on the ground, to internally displaced persons moving to other states of Ethiopia, and to the refugees in Sudan. There is no acceptable reason for impeding this kind of access.

More broadly, as USIP’s Payton Knopf has written, international inertia on Ethiopia cannot be justified by imperfect or incomplete information. While American leverage on Ethiopia has been damaged by President Trump’s remarks on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, Ethiopia remains a vital strategic partner for the United States in matters of regional security, counterterrorism, migration, and peacekeeping. China is also massively invested in Ethiopia, in many deals that were reached in the days of the rule of the TPLF. Therefore, the United States, China, and others have a mutual interest in seeing a quick end to hostilities, creating the space for other forms of dialogue and discussion. While a formal international mediation process may not be necessary, honest international brokers should urgently convey to both sides, in unequivocal terms, their expectation and hope that hostilities should be halted without further delay.

Svar på spørsmål om konflikten i Etiopia – 11.12.2020

Regjeringen 

Svar til Stortinget | Dato: 11.12.2020

Mottager: Stortingets kontor, Ekspedisjonskontoret

Utenriksminister Ine Eriksen Søreides svar på et spørsmål fra Bjørnar Moxnes (R) om hva Norge blant annet gjør for å sikre en uavhengig og troverdig dokumentering av krigshandlinger og overgrep mot sivilbefolkningen i Etiopia, og hva gjør Norge for å hjelpe menneskene som er tvunget på flukt?

Spørsmål nr. 644 (2020-2021).
Datert 4.12.2020

Spørsmål fra representant Bjørnar Moxnes (R) til utenriksministeren:

Hva gjør Norge for å sikre en uavhengig og troverdig dokumentering av krigshandlinger og overgrep mot sivilbefolkningen i Etiopia; hva mener Norge om konflikten; hvordan har Norge fulgt opp hendelsene overfor Etiopias regjering, og hva gjør Norge for å hjelpe menneskene som er tvunget på flukt?

Utenriksministerens svar:

Jeg deler stortingsrepresentantens bekymring over de siste ukers konflikt i den etiopiske regionen Tigray, med store konsekvenser for sivilbefolkningen. Det vises i den sammenheng til svar på tidligere skriftlige spørsmål, henholdsvis spørsmål 391 fra representant Tvedt Solberg og spørsmål 522 fra representant Navarsete. Viser for øvrig til mine uttalelser og pressemeldinger hhv 14/11, 25/11, 29/11 og 3/12 som alle uttrykker bekymring over situasjonen i Tigray, konsekvenser for sivilbefolkningen, og der det varsles om økt humanitær støtte fra Norge.

Det er kun en politisk løsning som kan få slutt på denne krisen. Jeg har derfor sterkt oppfordret etiopiske myndigheter om å engasjere seg konstruktivt med Den afrikanske union og dens tre utsendinger for å søke fredelige løsninger. Norge, sammen med det internasjonale samfunn, driver et aktivt påvirkningsarbeid overfor etiopiske myndigheter med budskap om dialog og forsoning. Som en bekymret venn av Etiopia står Norge klar å tilby støtte til framtidige freds- og forsoningstiltak hvis vi blir forespurt.

Det er fremdeles utfordringer med oppfølging i avtalen om humanitære korridorer til Tigray, slik at hjelpeorganisasjoner kan bistå en sårbar befolkning i regionen og de som har flyktet til nabolandet Sudan. Norge økte nylig den humanitære innsatsen med nær NOK 27 millioner og har tett kontakt med FN og øvrige humanitære organisasjoner. Jeg forventer at partene i konflikten respekterer internasjonal humanitærrett og unngår brudd på internasjonale menneskerettigheter. Partene har etter humanitærretten et ansvar for å sikre beskyttelse av sivilbefolkningen. Dette innebærer også en plikt til å sørge for trygg og uhindret humanitær tilgang til alle de som er rammet. Eventuelle brudd på humanitærretten og menneskerettighetsovergrep må etterforskes og straffeforfølges.

Amnesty International rapporterte for noen uker siden om grove menneskerettighetsbrudd i vestligste delene av Tigray. Vi legger til grunn at det kan komme flere rapporter med påstander om menneskerettighetsbrudd og overgrep, men manglende fysisk tilgang og kommunikasjonslinjer til Tigray gjør at det fremdeles er svært vanskelig å få verifisert påstander om overgrep mot sivilbefolkningen. I samarbeid med det internasjonale samfunn vil Norge fortløpende vurdere ulike tilnærminger for å få verifisert konsekvensene av konflikten og eventuelle brudd på internasjonal humanitærrett og internasjonale menneskerettigheter. Norge støtter FNs høykommisær for menneskerettigheters arbeid i Etiopia og har løpende kontakt om utviklingen i landet. Forslag om granskings- og undersøkelseskommisjoner kan fremmes gjennom ulike deler av FN-systemet. Dette er ofte prosesser som er krevende politisk og ressursmessig, og som tar tid.

Fra norsk side følges utviklingen tett og vi er i dialog med etiopiske myndigheter, sivilt samfunn, humanitære- og utviklingspartnere i Etiopia. 1. desember hadde jeg en telefonsamtale med Etiopias utenriksminister Demeke Mekonnen. Her uttrykte jeg et klart norsk budskap om å søke politisk løsning, sikre humanitær tilgang og gi tilgang til Tigray for å kunne verifisere konsekvensene for sivilbefolkningen. Jeg har også tatt opp Tigraykonflikten i bilaterale samtaler med andre lands utenriksministre. Utenriksdepartementet har de siste ukene møtt representanter for etiopisk diasporamiljø i Norge samt menneskerettighetsorganisasjoner.

Is the War in Ethiopia’s Tigray Region Ending or Only Just Beginning?

The Jamestown Foundation | Michael Horton

On November 28, Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed Ali declared victory in his government’s three- week-long war against the Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) (al-Jazeera, November 28). Abiy’s declaration followed the seizure by federal troops of Mekelle, which is the capital city of Ethiopia’s Tigray region (Nazret, November 28; Ethiopian News Agency, December 3). The fight for Mekelle, a city of over a half a million, was quickly concluded as TPLF troops carried out a strategic withdrawal from the city. The TPLF, which commands at least 100,000 fighters and possesses an abundance of heavy weaponry, could have fought to retain control of what has long been their seat of power. [1] Instead, they chose to retreat to the surrounding mountains.

This strategic retreat and the TPLF’s long and storied history as skilled guerrilla fighters does not bode well for Prime Minister Abiy’s hasty declaration of victory. Until 2018, the TPLF was the dominant political power in Ethiopia and has governed much of the Tigray region since its rise to prominence in the late 1970s. The armed forces loyal to the TPLF include many of Ethiopia’s most experienced and well-trained officers, NCOs, and enlisted men and women. The TPLF, which oversaw Ethiopia’s brutally efficient internal security service during its time as the country’s preeminent political party (1991-2018), can also draw on hundreds of well-trained intelligence officers and agents.

In addition to its thousands of soldiers, the TPLF has long had access to heavy and medium weaponry dating from its time as the predominant political power. For the three decades in which it dominated Ethiopian politics, the TPLF leadership made sure that ethnic Tigrayan troops received the best weapons and training. While there was an ethnic component to these efforts, the Tigray region shares a border with Eritrea. When the TPLF controlled Ethiopia, it oversaw a costly two-year long war (1998-2000) with Eritrea in which Tigrayan officers held many of the senior commands.

If the TPLF chooses to fight a protracted guerrilla war, it is well prepared to do so. Besides an abundance of capable fighters, intelligence officers, and caches of weaponry, the mountainous Tigray region is ideal terrain for guerrilla warfare. It is also doubtful that the TPLF would feel constrained to limit its attacks to targets within the Tigray region. The TPLF has the means to conduct covert attacks on soft targets throughout Ethiopia. [2]

A War Everyone Knew was Coming

Sidelining elites, especially when they have held power for three decades, is always fraught with potential blowback. Prime Minister Abiy’s rise to power within the ruling coalition party, the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), was swift. When Abiy assumed the office of prime minister in April 2018, he lost no time in enacting sweeping and much needed governmental, economic, and security sector reforms. The TPLF, which was the dominant member of the EPRDF governing coalition, had maintained a firm grip on the levers of power since its members overthrew Ethiopia’s Marxist Derg regime led by Mengitsu Haile Mariam in 1991. [3] While the overthrow of the Derg improved the lives of many Ethiopians, the TPLF leadership banned opposition parties, imprisoned dissidents, limited non-state sanctioned media, and was slow to enact needed economic reforms.

In his first months in office, Abiy’s government freed thousands of political prisoners, announced that it would amend Ethiopia’s harsh anti-terrorism law, and allowed for more press freedom. Abiy also tackled constitutional reform as he sought to move away from Ethiopia’s ethnically based federal system. On the international front, Abiy signed a Joint Declaration of Peace and Friendship with Eritrea in July 2018, for which he won the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize. In November 2019, the EPRDF ruling coalition was rolled into a political party called the Prosperity Party, led by Abiy. Notably, the TPLF refused to join the new Prosperity Party Coalition (Africa News, November 21, 2019).

The speed of Abiy’s reforms over the last three years has been nothing short of stunning. The refusal of the TPLF to join the newly formed Prosperity Party in late 2019 was a proverbial shot across the bow. In October 2020, the TPLF leadership denied the Abiy-led government’s right to rule stating that Abiy’s postponement of the August 2020 elections due to COVID-19 violated the constitution (Africa News, June 24; The Reporter May 9). The TPLF held its own regional elections in September of 2020 in the Tigray region (al-Jazeera, September 9; The East African, September 9). The central government in Addis Ababa ruled the election null and void (al-Jazeera, October 19).

While many of the Abiy government’s reforms are laudable, an undercurrent of fear runs alongside them. Many politicians within not only the TPLF, but also within other regional and ethnic political parties worry about the re-centralization of political power at the expense of regional level authority.

These fears were already pervasive in Tigray in September 2019, with many members of the TPLF and the armed forces it commands actively preparing for armed conflict with the national government. During this author’s trip to the Tigray region in September 2019, the tension in what were then TPLF controlled cites of Adwa, Mekelle and Axum was palpable. In the countryside, many communities—those that were able—were setting aside extra stores of grain to guard against shortages arising from a war that many thought imminent.

War and Legitimacy

Over the course of 2019 and into 2020, relations between the federal government and the TPLF steadily deteriorated. Open conflict began on November 4 when military forces loyal to the TPLF launched a preemptive attack on the Ethiopian National Defense Force’s (ENDF) Northern Command Headquarters near Tigray’s capital city of Mekelle (TRT World, December 3). TPLF forces rapidly overran the command headquarters and a number of minor outposts. However, ENDF units, which were prepositioned in preparation for such a conflict, launched successful counter-attacks on multiple fronts within 24 hours of the assault. Within hours ENDF mechanized units seized control of most of Route 1, a major road that connects Mekelle with points north and south, thereby cutting off the city. [4]

The outbreak of hostilities did not come as a surprise to Abiy’s government. Preparations for war by both the ENDF and the TPLF have been underway for months in the case of the former, and likely for much of the last year in the case of the latter. “Prime Minister Abiy and Debretsion Gebremichael (leader of the TPLF and president of the Tigray region) backed each other into a corner,” explained an Ethiopia-based analyst and former security official. “By moving slower with his reforms, especially with political reforms, Abiy could have achieved more and avoided war,” the same analyst explained. “Abiy put the old guard of the TPLF in a position where the only option left for them was to revert to what brought them to power in the first place: war.” [5]

The TPLF, which formed in 1975, grew from a few cells of no more than two hundred men and women into a highly capable political and military organization that would lead the effort to overthrow the Mengitsu regime in May 1991. [6] TPLF leaders combined political acumen with a sophisticated military strategy that embraced guerrilla warfare whilst also preparing and training its fighters to engage in traditional battles involving artillery and tanks. Simultaneously, the TPLF developed an extensive countrywide network of intelligence assets that helped its leaders to liaise with other groups battling the Derg and to coordinate attacks on regime targets.

Despite internecine fighting with rival groups like the Marxist-Leninist League of Tigray (MLLT) and the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front (EPLF), the TPLF retained and enhanced its role as Ethiopia’s preeminent rebel group. In 1988, the TPLF helped found the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), the political coalition that dominated Ethiopian politics from the overthrow of Mengitsu in 1991 until its displacement in 2019 by the Prosperity Party.

The TPLF’s role within the EPRDF government was, for much of the last three decades, out of all proportion to the size of the population of Tigray. Tigrayans only make up six percent of Ethiopia’s population of 110 million. The TPLF long justified the disproportionate size of its role in government by pointing to the fact that TPLF fighters made up the largest contingent of those forces that opposed the Derg and battled Eritrea.

“Tigrayans and the TPLF view themselves as Ethiopia’s liberators from the Derg and as its defenders against outside enemies like the Eritreans,” a former member of the TPLF explained. “It is this position as Ethiopia’s liberators and defenders that the TPLF use to justify their power. They will fight to retain what they view as their hard-earned right to govern—at least in Tigray.”

Cycles of Violence: Igniting Ethiopia’s Ethnic and Inter-Religious Tinderbox

At a minimum, the TPLF wants to retain control of the Tigray region. Abiy’s proposed reforms to Ethiopia’s ethnic based federal system are viewed as a direct threat to the TPLF and to what many in the party and Tigray region see as de facto independence. These reforms which aim to weaken Ethiopia’s ethnically based federalism in favor of a pan-nationalist framework are also viewed as a threat to self-determination by other ethnic political parties. The TPLF has long enjoyed a free hand within Tigray where, under the federal system, it is charged with most administrative decisions and affairs. Additionally, the TPLF maintains control of regional police, security services, and militias.

Beyond retaining control of the Tigray region, it is unclear what the TPLF’s ultimate goal might be. The current Ethiopian Constitution, ratified in 1995, guarantees the right of self-determination—and even the right to secede—to every nation and people in Ethiopia. [7] The Abiy government’s declaration of the September 2020 Tigrayan elections as illegal and the suspension of the disbursement of federal funds to the region have both been viewed by the TPLF as attacks on regional autonomy (Ethiopia Insight, October 19).

The measures taken by the Abiy government, while possibly justified, will stoke resentment among Tigrayans. If these actions are followed by punitive military campaigns and ethnic profiling, the TPLF will have no shortage of support for what could be a long and costly war. Unfortunately, incidents of ethnic based violence by the TPLF, the Abiy government, the Ethiopian National Defense Force, and regional militias are already being reported.

TPLF-linked militias are accused of attacking day laborers who belong to the major ethnic Amhara group in the town of May Cadera with machetes. Unverified reports suggest that over 600 civilians were killed in the attack. [8] The attack follows reports of Tigrayans living outside of the Tigray region being imprisoned, fired from their jobs, and expelled from ethnically mixed communities in major cities. [9]  Some reports indicate that militias consisting of ethnic Amharas, known as the Fano, are fighting against the TPLF in southern Tigray. If such ethnic based attacks persist and worsen, the war in Tigray will spread beyond the region’s borders. The TPLF possesses the ability to launch retaliatory attacks on targets outside of Tigray and indeed, as evidenced by rocket attacks on the Eritrean capital of Asmara on November 14 and 27, outside of Ethiopia (al-Jazeera, November 29). [10] Ethnically-driven attacks by any of the warring parties could lead to spiraling violence. The Abiy government has previously accused the TPLF of stoking ethnic tensions in other parts of Ethiopia like Oromia, a regional state of the country, in a bid to destabilize Abiy’s government. [11]

Ethiopia is a tinderbox of ethnic tensions. A rebellion in Tigray and a heavy-handed response by the Abiy government could ignite tensions in other areas like the Oromia regional state, the ethnically Somali regional state in the Ogaden area, the Afar region, and the Gambella region. In the case of Oromia, inter-communal and inter-religious violence have already resulted in hundreds of dead and the internal displacement of thousands. Many of these areas, like most of Ethiopia, are underdeveloped and have derived limited benefit from Ethiopia’s recent economic boom. Most of the gains from the boom remain concentrated among Ethiopia’s elite (with Tigrayans still representing many of these elite stakeholders) in the national capital of Addis Ababa. While Ethiopia, like many African countries, has not suffered much of an impact from the coronavirus pandemic, the economic fallout from international efforts to combat the virus are taking a serious toll on the Ethiopian economy. A slowing economy and reduced international investment as well as rising food prices will further exacerbate ethnic and inter-religious tensions.

While many Ethiopians view the TPLF negatively due to its former primacy in national politics, others are sympathetic to the TPLF’s claim that it is defending regional autonomy. During the 1980s, the TPLF proved adept at building ties with other ethnically based political and rebel groups. [12] The TPLF will pursue a similar strategy if it fights a protracted war in Tigray. The leadership of the TPLF will build on its relations with other political and rebel groups in a bid to combat the Abiy government. Harsh responses by Ethiopia’s security services and military to local protests and/or armed factions will feed existing cycles of violence and start new ones.

Regional Implications

Ethiopia is the preeminent military and economic power in the Horn of Africa. Any serious instability in Ethiopia will impact neighboring countries and the broader region. The war in Tigray is already in danger of destabilizing parts of Kassala state in eastern Sudan which now hosts an estimated 50,000 refugees from Tigray. [13] The Tigray region itself was already home to over 100,000 Eritrean refugees.

The TPLF, which has twice fired rockets into Eritrea, claims that Eritrean troops are aiding Abiy’s war against them. TPLF leaders accuse the Eritrean Army of operating deep within Ethiopia’s northern border, something that U.S. officials have seemingly confirmed (al-Ahram, December 2). [14] The presence of Eritrean troops on Ethiopian territory could easily revive old and long-standing tensions over border areas.

Further afield, Ethiopia has withdrawn large numbers of troops from the ethnically Somali Ogaden to bolster its efforts in Tigray (Somali Affairs, November 3). These units police Ethiopia’s long border with Somalia and periodically operate within Somalia where they aid that country’s fight against al-Shabaab. The Ogaden is also home to the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF), which has fought for the right of self-determination for the ethnic Somalis who inhabit the region. The ONLF declared a unilateral ceasefire in 2018 and recently called for all parties in the war in Tigray to negotiate. However, the ONLF, like other rebel groups active in Ethiopia, may take advantage of opportunities arising from a weakened Abiy government.

If the war persists, it has the potential to attract outside powers with an interest in aiding stability in Ethiopia or, conversely, instability. Instability can be easily encouraged through the covert provision of aid and arms to Ethiopia’s armed rebel groups. One need only look at the civil war in Yemen, where at least six outside powers are involved, to see how such events could play out in Ethiopia. Even at this early stage in the war in Tigray, there are unconfirmed reports that in addition to Eritrea, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is involved, at least at a low level, in the conflict. [15]

Outlook

Barring deft and realistic negotiations between the warring parties, the TPLF leadership, or at least factions within the leadership, may launch a long and costly guerrilla war. The TPLF has the means and knowledge to fight a war that could persist—at least on a low level—for years. While the Ethiopian military is capable and well-equipped, it will struggle to contain an insurgency in Tigray’s mountainous terrain. If the Ethiopian military engages in ethnically driven attacks on suspected supporters of the TPLF, the insurgency will only grow and spread. A lengthy war in Tigray will seep into other Ethiopian regions and may attract the benign and malevolent interest of multiple outside powers.

Notes

[1] Estimates of TPLF troop strength range as high as 250,000. It is difficult to assess actual troop strength due to the presence of a large number of informal militias loyal to the TPLF. A more accurate and conservative estimate of the number of men and women in formal and informal fighting forces loyal to the TPLF is 100,000 to 125,000.

[2] Author interview with former government official, September 2019.

[3] The Derg, meaning committee or council, was officially called the Provisional Military Government of Socialist Ethiopia.

[4] Author interview with multiple Ethiopia based analysts, December 2020.

[5] Author interview with former Ethiopia based security official, December 2020.

[6] See: John Young, Peasant Revolution in Ethiopia: The Tigray People’s Liberation Front, 1975-1991 (Cambridge University Press, 2008).

[7] See: https://ethiopianembassy.be/wp-content/uploads/Constitution-of-the-FDRE.pdf

[8] See: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/11/ethiopia-investigation-reveals-evidence-that-scores-of-civilians-were-killed-in-massacre-in-tigray-state/

[9] See: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2018/03/28/the-unenviable-situation-of-tigreans-in-ethiopia/

[10] The TPLF is known to possess BM-21 rocket systems. However, the range on these systems, even with upgrades, is not long enough for the rockets to reach Asmara from Tigrayan territory. Therefore the TPLF’s arsenal may include some other typed of system such as the Chinese manufactured PHL-03 or the Russian made BM-30. Alternatively, the TPLF may have launched the rockets from within Eritrean territory.

[11] See: https://qz.com/africa/1936138/how-ethiopias-ethnic-power-politics-led-to-tigray-conflict/

[12] See: Jenny Hammond, Fire from the Ashes: A Chronicle of the Revolution in Tigray, Ethiopia, 1975-1991 (Red Sea Press, 1998).

[13] See: https://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/asset/2586/2586069/

[14] See: https://www.reuters.com/article/ethiopia-conflict-eritrea/exclusive-u-s-thinks-eritrea-has-joined-ethiopian-war-diplomats-say-idUSKBN28I1OX

[15] The UAE has close military to military ties with the ENDF and with the Eritrean government and army. The UAE operates a base in the Eritrean town of Assab where it has based drones and aircraft for use in its war in Yemen. See: https://www.bellingcat.com/news/rest-of-world/2020/11/19/are-emirati-armed-drones-supporting-ethiopia-from-an-eritrean-air-base/

Søreide: Eventuelle menneskerettsbrudd i Tigray må etterforskes

iTromsø.no  | Utenriksminister Ine Eriksen Søreide er bekymret over rapporter om menneskerettighetsbrudd og overgrep i krigsherjede Tigray, og sier det må granskes.

I et skriftlig svar til Rødts Bjørnar Moxnes om hva regjeringen mener om krigen i Etiopias Tigray-region, og hva utenriksdepartementet gjør med saken, sier Søreide at Norge «som en bekymret venn av Etiopia» er klar til å tilby støtte til framtidige freds- og forsoningstiltak.

Jeg forventer at partene i konflikten respekterer internasjonal humanitærrett og unngår brudd på internasjonale menneskerettigheter. Eventuelle brudd på humanitærretten og menneskerettighetsovergrep må etterforskes og straffeforfølges, sier Søreide.

Utenriksministeren viser til at Amnesty International har meldt om grove menneskerettighetsbrudd vest i Tigray, men at det er vanskelig å ut informasjon fra regionen, som har vært avskåret fra omverdenen siden krigen brøt ut i starten av november.

– Vi legger til grunn at det kan komme flere rapporter med påstander om menneskerettighetsbrudd og overgrep, sier Søreide.

– I samarbeid med det internasjonale samfunn vil Norge fortløpende vurdere ulike tilnærminger for å få verifisert konsekvensene av konflikten og eventuelle brudd på internasjonal humanitærrett og internasjonale menneskerettigheter, sier Søreide, og understreker at en granskings- og undersøkelseskommisjon kan fremmes gjennom ulike deler av FN-systemet.

(©NTB)

What Ethiopia’s Ethnic Unrest Means for China

The Diplomat |  China’s massive investments in Ethiopia give it a lot to lose amid renewed sectarian violence.

Media reports have hardly mentioned what the latest episode of sectarian violence in Ethiopia could cost China. Few of the East African country’s foreign investors have more to lose, however. Officials in Beijing see Ethiopia as a hub for the Belt and Road Initiative, an ongoing project to expand China’s sphere of influence by bankrolling infrastructure throughout the Global South. China has poured money into the East African country in a bid to earn its goodwill, but ever-rising tensions between Ethiopian ethnic groups are undermining that strategy.

In early November, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed declared war on the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), the ruling party of the Tigray Region. Abiy accused the TPLF – the most influential representative of Ethiopia’s Tigray minority group – of attacking an Ethiopian military base. The Ethiopian National Defense Force’s ensuing foray into the Tigray Region followed months of tensions between the TPLF-led local government and Ethiopia’s central government.

The subsequent conflict had immediate consequences for China, which raced to evacuate several hundred citizens from the Tigray Region. China Gezhouba Group Co. Ltd., a company linked to China’s government, pulled 402 workers from a project near the Tigrayan capital of Mekelle, and 187 employees of the Chinese state-owned enterprise China CAMC Engineering Co. Ltd. fled the area in vehicles. The Chinese Embassy in the Ethiopian capital of Addis Ababa said that it assisted with the evacuations of Chinese citizens and other foreign nationals.

Abiy’s war on the TPLF has cast doubt on the future of foreign direct investment in the Tigray Region. The Chinese state-owned enterprise China Communications Construction Company Ltd. built Mekelle’s most important industrial park, and companies from Bangladesh, China, India, and the United Kingdom had expressed interest in operating there prior to Abiy’s offensive. The industrial park’s ability to attract foreign investors looks far less certain now.

Ethiopia seems to recognize the potential adverse effects that sectarian strife could have on its business relationship with China. “We know that safety and security, peace, and stability are key to foreign investors and that’s why we are trying to bring the situation back to normalcy, so that the economic and industrialization process that we have started in Ethiopia could continue without major disruption,” Teshome Toga Chanaka, the Ethiopian ambassador to China, said after announcing the successful evacuations of 600 Chinese from the Tigray Region.

Ethiopia’s military captured Mekelle from the TPLF in late November and appears to have all but defeated the group on the battlefield. Nonetheless, the prospect of a lengthy TPLF insurgency looks likely. This possibility raises the question of when Chinese companies can return to the Tigray Region. Gezhouba Group was working on what China’s state media called a $270 million “water supply project,” an enterprise that has become far riskier since November.

Even if Gezhouba Group does have to postpone or abandon that project, the Tigray Region represents just one aspect of China’s wider investment strategy in Ethiopia. By June 2020, Chinese companies had cemented plans to spend $2.7 billion in the East African country through no less than 1,500 initiatives. Ethiopia imports most of its goods from China and only exports more goods to the United States, China’s main rival in Africa. The East African country has also borrowed $16 billion from China, which amounts to half of Ethiopia’s national debt.

Though China’s wide-ranging financial ties to Ethiopia might cushion the economic fallout from the Tigrayan conflict, they could also become new vulnerabilities. To increase pressure on Abiy, the TPLF might choose to target Chinese projects well outside the Tigray Region. The TPLF’s battle with Ethiopian forces has already spilled into other areas, including the Amhara Region and even Ethiopia’s neighbor Eritrea, another key front for the Belt and Road Initiative.

In addition to the threat from the TPLF, Abiy is contending with an insurgency by the Oromo Liberation Front, which Ethiopian officials blamed for a massacre of civilians from the Amhara ethnic group in the Oromia Region in early November. If this type of sectarian violence becomes typical, China may rethink the wisdom of making further investments in Ethiopia.

China’s own ability to affect the outcomes of these conflicts remains limited. While the Belt and Road Initiative has given China a significant economic presence in Africa, Beijing had limited experience in mediating in the continent’s conflicts, in part due to its longstanding policy of “non-interference.” In a notable exception, China helped broker a fragile peace between Sudan and South Sudan, but internal ethnic conflicts – such as the ones plaguing Ethiopia – are more difficult for Beijing to handle from abroad.

In another telling example, Gezhouba Group and other Chinese companies are assisting Ethiopia with the construction of a controversial dam that contributed to a dispute between Ethiopia and Egypt. Yet American diplomats, not Chinese officials, have taken the lead in helping the two African countries resolve that disagreement.

Amid unrest in Ethiopia, Beijing may turn its attention to less problematic East African endeavors. Djibouti, which hosts a sprawling Chinese military base, looks like an obvious choice for continued investment. China has also attempted to strengthen its ties to Eritrea, where the China Shanghai Corporation for Foreign Economic and Technological Cooperation is building a major road.

Even if China chooses to explore opportunities elsewhere in East Africa, Ethiopia seems likely to top Chinese diplomats’ agenda for East Africa. China and Ethiopia have expressed their enthusiasm for expanding military ties, and officers from the Ethiopian military have even received training in China. The Tigrayan conflict and Oromo insurgency notwithstanding, Ethiopia also offers a much more promising environment for foreign direct investment than other East African countries where China has undertaken diplomatic and economic initiatives.

China’s attempt to invest in the petroleum industry in South Sudan, which has swung in and out of civil war for almost a decade, has yielded mixed results and even led to Chinese deaths. In Somalia, China has fared little better: the militant group al-Shabaab, an affiliate of al-Qaeda, struck the Chinese embassy in Mogadishu with a car bomb back in 2015.

By comparison, Ethiopia’s challenges with militancy seem far easier to manage. In 2018, Abiy concluded peace treaties with Eritrea and a rebel group in the Ethiopian region of Ogaden, ending decades-long conflicts that foreign diplomats had considered intractable. If Abiy takes the same approach to the TPLF insurgency, China appears set to reward Ethiopia with greater investment in the immediate future and stronger diplomatic and military ties down the road.